Still.... what set of skills???

Finally,
We have come to the stage of compiling the lists of skills after distilling them from the various CPDD curriculum guide. It is not meaningful if we are just accumulating the skills on one list.
How to make it meaningful to the teachers?
We tried looking at the 21st century skills to see if we can have some broad strands that we can use and then compiling the list according to those strands. But even then I realised that we have a few problems during our discussions.
1.   We have problem distinguishing between tools and skills. We are not specialists who have in depth knowledge of the curriculum, skills, knowledge, tools, etc.
2.   The terminologies used in the different subjects may not literally mean so. Eg. Investigation in science is totally different from investigation in History.
3.   Some of these strands or skills do overlap each other. Eg, thinking skills and communication skills. A substantial amount of comprehension skill, analytical skills etc is need to perform good communication skills.

So how about just compiling the thinking skills (based on Blooms Taxonomy) across the various departments? Then skills like managing information, communication skills are just ways of exhibiting the thinking skills *.

After having a brief look at an article on Blooms Taxonomy and the skills distilled from the CPDD curriculum guide, it seems that all the subjects would have covered all the thinking skills, based on my assumption above *.
Then why are the students not applying the thinking skills across?
Is it because the higher order thinking skills are not explicitly taught in the school?
Is it because the teachers are competent enough to teach the higher order thinking skills? (me included)
Is it because the students need to be explicitly shown the linkage and cross application of skills?

Only when we have the key leverage question, then the curriculum development team can gear towards the right direction to help. No answer yet.
We have to research more and talk to more people before we can synthesize the ideas.

But one good idea that the team came up with is that a suggested list of tools is to be given for each skill, so that the teachers will find that list complete and useful for implementation.

What skills to look at?

What is curriculum? It varies in different countries.

To me, curriculum is a binding cycle of Content(knowledge, skills and attitudes), Assessment of these intended content to be learnt and Pedagogy/ programes that allows the content to reach out to the pupils.
Assessment should be aligned to the content or intended learning outcome.

Through the process of talking to various Head of Departments, teachers and VP, I begin to have many doubts in my curriculum development work this year.....
1.  all departments has documents from CPDD and SEAB. However, the learning outcomes that are listed in the SEAB's documents is not exactly aligned to the CPDD's. At the very least, some of the skills suggested by CPDD are not tested.
2.   Most departments focus on the SEAB's learning outcomes as that is one of our core business; to help our pupils to pass with flying colours at O level exams. SOWs are crafted out based on the SEAB's documents. Hence the CPDD's document in these departments are often ignored.
3.   C2015 and 21st century competencies will be the next wave of focus. They are not really something new. They are skills that many teachers knew are important and had subtly delivered in some lessons here and there. More conscious efforts needed to teach these skills on top of delivering content knowledge. Are our teachers up to it, within this few years? The delivery of content and the SEAB's learning outcome will remain as our key focus for the next few years to come as we need to get better O level results.
4.  for the same skill, the assessment criteria is different for different subject. For example, the requirements in drawing of graphs in maths, physics and chemistry is different. The various subject teachers holds the expertise on how best to teach their subject, not me.

Seeing all the above factors, how can I value add to the school's curriculum to benefit the teachers and pupils? I was naive and ambitious with my intitial intention to audit school's set of skills that is actually being taught against the ideal set of skills based on the C2015 and 21st century competencies. To add on to the challenge, the skills set in C2015 and 21st century competencies are not clearly spelled out yet.
The last thing I want to see, is the hard work of my team members go to waste in the end as their work is not useful to the teachers and pupils.

I have come to this conclusion at this point. My team members and I will gather the ideal set of skills that comprise of the essential skills ( from the CPDD and SEAB documents) that will help them pass the O levels as well as some core skills derived from the 21st century competencies that we deem as very important.
Then we start to audit our school's set of skills actually taught against this ideal set.

Another Random observation and thoughts

SRP, starting next week.
Teachers told to select pupils based on diagnostic tests.
But why?
If SRP is a means to help close the learning gap (AfL, 3rd question), the "diagnostic" (AfL 2nd question) should be done at the end of last year.
Since SRP is an ongoing thing for every year,
If the SOW is a continuous flow from sec 3 to 4, and
If the end of year exam was analysed in a certain way (itemised, etc),
the key topics for revision during SRP for the can be structured and planned out. The students for SRP would have been selected by the end of the previous year.

Dream Potter - Are You One?

I have a weakness.

I always cry when I see another human being being abused or disadvantaged. My heart always goes out to the less fortunate. I was crying while watching Dream Potter on channel 8. I was sad when I see that one's dream cannot be fulfilled within his ability. I was touched when I see the kind hearted souls come forward to lend a helping hand and fulfill his dreams.

Everyone has dream. Everyone has plans for the future. Every parent has high hopes and big plans when their babies were born and wants the best in everything for their child. I can really understand this after my dear Nicole is born. So when I searched for an infant care centre for her, I made sure that it is a care centre that I can trust and put my heart at ease while I am away working. I chat with the care givers at the centre to check their knowledge in caring for infants and observed how they work as a team to take care of the babies.

Trust is something that the parents give when they send their children to our school (either by choice or not). So what will ensure that this trust exists or sustain? When the parents know that their children are in good hands. Meaning, good facilities, good educational programs and more importantly care givers who have sound knowledge of teaching and learning, care givers of good moral standing who are good role models for their children. Not much different from choosing an infant care centre, isn't it?
Since trust is bestowed upon the staff in the school, the staff should be the children's dream potters. But have all of us been truely the children's dream potters?
"With great powers come great responsibility". I truely felt this way today due to an incident in school. That is another story.
We know we are dream potters when we feel worn out at the end of the day, when we bring a smile to their face, when they are able to pursue their dreams when they leave school, when they continue to further study the subjects that we taught.
We fail to be dream potters when we stop reflecting deeply on our teaching practice, when we stop mentoring and grooming the young teachers, when we act in contradiction to our core values, when we stop encouraging them when the children falls, when we see them cry at the release of results.

Have you been a dream potter today?

Random Observations and Thoughts

While working on the teacher's load in preparation for the relief duties, I realised that one third of our teachers are heavily loaded. All our beginning teachers are heavily loaded according to the MOE guidelines. To date, we have a lot of young teachers. This is not very healthy as there may not be passing on of good teaching and learning strategies to these teachers, their content knowledge may not be very strong and their fire may fizzle out very fast.
If these continues, the body of knowledge of teaching and learning within the school may not be as rich and it may spiral downwards.
They must have good mentors and these mentors must be told their responsibilities to getting the teachers acclimatised to our school culture as well as keeping their fire burning.

It is painful to see my hard work goes to waste. But upon reflection, I realised that I must not be the only one clear about it's objectives and rationale.  The ones using, the one executing must be clear too. And of course the high utility will follow. If nobody is using, then forget it.
For my new team, I must bear that in mind and for my new work, I must make it user friendly. And lucky me, I have a good team who constantly seek clarity of the work involved and the whys....